[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130325010526.893824091@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:05:50 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Subject: [ 026/104] selinux: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
commit 4502403dcf8f5c76abd4dbab8726c8e4ecb5cd34 upstream.
The call tree here is:
sk_clone_lock() <- takes bh_lock_sock(newsk);
xfrm_sk_clone_policy()
__xfrm_sk_clone_policy()
clone_policy() <- uses GFP_ATOMIC for allocations
security_xfrm_policy_clone()
security_ops->xfrm_policy_clone_security()
selinux_xfrm_policy_clone()
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
security/selinux/xfrm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/security/selinux/xfrm.c
+++ b/security/selinux/xfrm.c
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ int selinux_xfrm_policy_clone(struct xfr
if (old_ctx) {
new_ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*old_ctx) + old_ctx->ctx_len,
- GFP_KERNEL);
+ GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!new_ctx)
return -ENOMEM;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists