[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130325010527.529757689@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 01:05:57 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 033/104] bonding: dont call update_speed_duplex() under spinlocks
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit 876254ae2758d50dcb08c7bd00caf6a806571178 ]
bond_update_speed_duplex() might sleep while calling underlying slave's
routines. Move it out of atomic context in bond_enslave() and remove it
from bond_miimon_commit() - it was introduced by commit 546add79, however
when the slave interfaces go up/change state it's their responsibility to
fire NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_CHANGE events so that bonding can properly update
their speed.
I've tested it on all combinations of ifup/ifdown, autoneg/speed/duplex
changes, remote-controlled and local, on (not) MII-based cards. All changes
are visible.
Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 202ae34..63e3c47 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1715,6 +1715,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
bond_compute_features(bond);
+ bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
+
read_lock(&bond->lock);
new_slave->last_arp_rx = jiffies;
@@ -1758,8 +1760,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
new_slave->link = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
}
- bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
-
if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && bond->params.primary[0]) {
/* if there is a primary slave, remember it */
if (strcmp(bond->params.primary, new_slave->dev->name) == 0) {
@@ -2437,8 +2437,6 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
bond_set_backup_slave(slave);
}
- bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
-
pr_info("%s: link status definitely up for interface %s, %u Mbps %s duplex.\n",
bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name,
slave->speed, slave->duplex ? "full" : "half");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists