linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: modify __bio_add_page check to accept pages that don't start a new segment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:09:42 +0100
From:	Jan Vesely <jvesely@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	James Bottomley <james.bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Kai Mäkisara <kai.makisara@...umbus.fi>,
	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: modify __bio_add_page check to accept pages that
 don't start a new segment

On Thu 07 Mar 2013 12:23:13 CET, Jan Vesely wrote:

> On Thu 21 Feb 2013 09:30:26 CET, Jan Vesely wrote:
>> The original behavior was to refuse all pages after the maximum number of
>> segments has been reached. However, some drivers (like st) craft their buffers
>> to potentially require exactly max segments and multiple pages in the last
>> segment. This patch modifies the check to allow pages that can be merged into
>> the last segment.
>>
>> This change fixes EBUSY failures when using large (1mb) tape block size in high
>> memory fragmentation condition.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely <jvesely@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/bio.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++----------
>>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
>> index b96fc6c..02efbd5 100644
>> --- a/fs/bio.c
>> +++ b/fs/bio.c
>> @@ -500,7 +500,6 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct
>> bio *bio, struct page
>>                *page, unsigned int len, unsigned int offset,
>>                unsigned short max_sectors)
>>  {
>> -    int retried_segments = 0;
>>      struct bio_vec *bvec;
>>
>>      /*
>> @@ -551,18 +550,12 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q,
>> struct bio *bio, struct page
>>          return 0;
>>
>>      /*
>> -     * we might lose a segment or two here, but rather that than
>> -     * make this too complex.
>> +     * prepare segment count check, reduce segment count if possible
>>       */
>>
>> -    while (bio->bi_phys_segments >= queue_max_segments(q)) {
>> -
>> -        if (retried_segments)
>> -            return 0;
>> -
>> -        retried_segments = 1;
>> +    if (bio->bi_phys_segments >= queue_max_segments(q))
>>          blk_recount_segments(q, bio);
>> -    }
>> +
>>
>>      /*
>>       * setup the new entry, we might clear it again later if we
>> @@ -572,6 +565,19 @@ static int __bio_add_page(struct request_queue *q, struct
>> bio *bio, struct page
>>      bvec->bv_page = page;
>>      bvec->bv_len = len;
>>      bvec->bv_offset = offset;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * the other part of the segment count check, allow mergeable pages
>> +     */
>> +    if ((bio->bi_phys_segments > queue_max_segments(q)) ||
>> +        ( (bio->bi_phys_segments == queue_max_segments(q)) &&
>> +        !BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(bvec - 1, bvec))) {
>> +            bvec->bv_page = NULL;
>> +            bvec->bv_len = 0;
>> +            bvec->bv_offset = 0;
>> +            return 0;
>> +    }
>> +
>>
>>      /*
>>       * if queue has other restrictions (eg varying max sector size

ping?

The described failure is a regression introduced in
    46081b166415acb66d4b3150ecefcd9460bb48a1
    st: Increase success probability in driver buffer allocation

I have added the signers to cc. I can resend the patch if it is 
necessary

thank you,

--
Jan Vesely <jvesely@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/