[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i8gK+DNOk5tvRsVJFKyk0A2qOD_az7yJ5+3Y2xS=Ear1VkVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:47:42 +0700
From: Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hhuang@...hat.com,
"Low, Jason" <jason.low2@...com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@...com>
Subject: Re: ipc,sem: sysv semaphore scalability
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> And you never see this problem without Rik's patches?
No, never.
> Could you bisect
> *which* patch it starts with? Are the first four ones ok (the moving
> of the locking around, but without the fine-grained ones), for
> example?
With the first four patches only, I got some X server freeze (just tried once).
> Another thing to try might be to enable SLUB debugging (ie make sure that all of
>
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
> CONFIG_SLUB=y
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y
>
> are set in your kernel config)
My bad, I forgot to enable this in my former build, sorry. Here's what
I get now:
http://i.imgur.com/G6H8KgD.jpg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists