[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+i8gKKemdkjvsqMosDGsTrKbZOFPskEmfztW6vTdSAMSKmuwg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:21:41 +0700
From: Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hhuang@...hat.com,
"Low, Jason" <jason.low2@...com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@...com>
Subject: Re: ipc,sem: sysv semaphore scalability
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 09:47 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:10 AM, Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> And you never see this problem without Rik's patches?
>>
>>
>> No, never.
>>
>>> Could you bisect
>>> *which* patch it starts with? Are the first four ones ok (the moving
>>> of the locking around, but without the fine-grained ones), for
>>> example?
>>
>>
>> With the first four patches only, I got some X server freeze (just tried
>> once).
>
>
> Another random question, just to rule something out. What video driver
> are you using on your system?
intel on i3 330m
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists