linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2, part4 00/39] Simplify mem_init() implementations and kill num

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:19:34 +0800
From:	Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2, part4 00/39] Simplify mem_init() implementations
 and kill num_physpages

Hi James,
	Thanks for reminder, my patch series have been screwed up.
I will send another version and build a git tree on github.
	Thanks!
	Gerry
On 03/24/2013 04:11 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-24 at 15:24 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> The original goal of this patchset is to fix the bug reported by
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53501
>> Now it has also been expanded to reduce common code used by memory
>> initializion.
>>
>> This is the last part, previous three patch sets could be accessed at:
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136289696323825&w=2
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136290291524901&w=2
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=136345342831592&w=2
>>
>> This patchset applies to
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mhocko/mm.git since-3.8
> 
> You're going to have to have a git tree for this if you want this series
> testing on other architectures.  Plus cc'ing linux-arch would be a good
> idea for that case.  The patch series seems to be screwed up in the
> numbering:  The parisc patches 26/39 and 27/39 are identical.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/