linux-kernel - Re: ipc,sem: sysv semaphore scalability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+i8gKLY=ssqkHUsbLY-31RgVUhxLfkqV1QYort3mGH2Vd8xGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:09:15 +0700
From:	Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@...il.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, hhuang@...hat.com,
	"Low, Jason" <jason.low2@...com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>,
	"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@...com>
Subject: Re: ipc,sem: sysv semaphore scalability

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 11:20 AM, Emmanuel Benisty wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> With the first four patches only, I got some X server freeze (just
>>>>> tried once).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you try booting with panic=1 so the kernel panics on the first
>>>> oops?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry that should be "oops=panic"
>>>
>>>
>>>> Maybe that way (if we are lucky) we will be able to capture the first
>>>> oops, and maybe get an idea of what causes the problem.
>>
>>
>> Sorry Rik, I get all kind of weird behaviors (wireless dies, compiling
>> gets stuck and is impossible to kill, can't kill X) with the 4
>> patches+oops=panic but no trace. Here after is 7+1 patches with
>> oops=panic boot: http://i.imgur.com/1jep1qx.jpg
>
>
> This may be a stupid question, but you re-compile and re-install
> the kernel modules every time you changed the kernel?
>
> The behaviour you report with just the first four patches is so
> random, it sounds almost like a mismatched data structure between
> compiles...

Yes it's OK. I even started from scratch just in case but I'm still
getting the same weird things. Everything works just fine with a build
from Linus' tree which I normally use. I'll try the patches on another
machine tomorrow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/