linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130325191500.GA12767@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:15:00 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc:	laijs@...fujitsu.com, axboe@...nel.dk, jack@...e.cz,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, zab@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound
 workqueues

On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:55:06AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > the whole patchset is more complicated than my brain.
> 
> It isn't that complex, is it?  I mean, the difficult part - using
> multiple pwqs on unbound wq - already happened, and even that wasn't
> too complex as it in most part synchronized the behaviors between
> per-cpu and unbound workqueues.  All that NUMA support is doing is
> mapping different pwqs to different issuing CPUs.

Oh, BTW, please feel free to rebase your patchset on top of the
current wq/for-3.10.  I'll take care of the conflicts with the numa
one, if there are any.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/