linux-kernel - [ 05/72] bonding: dont call update_speed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:50:48 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 05/72] bonding: dont call update_speed_duplex() under spinlocks

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 876254ae2758d50dcb08c7bd00caf6a806571178 ]

bond_update_speed_duplex() might sleep while calling underlying slave's
routines. Move it out of atomic context in bond_enslave() and remove it
from bond_miimon_commit() - it was introduced by commit 546add79, however
when the slave interfaces go up/change state it's their responsibility to
fire NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_CHANGE events so that bonding can properly update
their speed.

I've tested it on all combinations of ifup/ifdown, autoneg/speed/duplex
changes, remote-controlled and local, on (not) MII-based cards. All changes
are visible.

Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1737,6 +1737,8 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond
 
 	bond_compute_features(bond);
 
+	bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
+
 	read_lock(&bond->lock);
 
 	new_slave->last_arp_rx = jiffies;
@@ -1780,8 +1782,6 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond
 		new_slave->link  = BOND_LINK_DOWN;
 	}
 
-	bond_update_speed_duplex(new_slave);
-
 	if (USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode) && bond->params.primary[0]) {
 		/* if there is a primary slave, remember it */
 		if (strcmp(bond->params.primary, new_slave->dev->name) == 0) {
@@ -2462,8 +2462,6 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bo
 				bond_set_backup_slave(slave);
 			}
 
-			bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
-
 			pr_info("%s: link status definitely up for interface %s, %u Mbps %s duplex.\n",
 				bond->dev->name, slave->dev->name,
 				slave->speed, slave->duplex ? "full" : "half");


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/