lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130326224247.755646571@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:42:39 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [ 50/98] drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c: use a variable for storing IMR

3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>

commit 0ef1594c017521ea89278e80fe3f80dafb17abde upstream.

On some revisions of AT91 SoCs, the RTC IMR register is not working.
Instead of elaborating a workaround for that specific SoC or IP version,
we simply use a software variable to store the Interrupt Mask Register
and modify it for each enabling/disabling of an interrupt.  The overhead
of this is negligible anyway.

The interrupt mask register (IMR) for the RTC is broken on the AT91SAM9x5
sub-family of SoCs (good overview of the members here:
http://www.eewiki.net/display/linuxonarm/AT91SAM9x5 ).  The "user visible
effect" is the RTC doesn't work.

That sub-family is less than two years old and only has devicetree (DT)
support and came online circa lk 3.7 .  The dust is yet to settle on the
DT stuff at least for AT91 SoCs (translation: lots of stuff is still
broken, so much that it is hard to know where to start).

The fix in the patch is pretty simple: just shadow the silicon IMR
register with a variable in the driver.  Some older SoCs (pre-DT) use the
the rtc-at91rm9200 driver (e.g.  obviously the AT91RM9200) and they should
not be impacted by the change.  There shouldn't be a large volume of
interrupts associated with a RTC.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Reported-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.h |    1 
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static DECLARE_COMPLETION(at91_rtc_updat
 static unsigned int at91_alarm_year = AT91_RTC_EPOCH;
 static void __iomem *at91_rtc_regs;
 static int irq;
+static u32 at91_rtc_imr;
 
 /*
  * Decode time/date into rtc_time structure
@@ -108,9 +109,11 @@ static int at91_rtc_settime(struct devic
 	cr = at91_rtc_read(AT91_RTC_CR);
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_CR, cr | AT91_RTC_UPDCAL | AT91_RTC_UPDTIM);
 
+	at91_rtc_imr |= AT91_RTC_ACKUPD;
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IER, AT91_RTC_ACKUPD);
 	wait_for_completion(&at91_rtc_updated);	/* wait for ACKUPD interrupt */
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IDR, AT91_RTC_ACKUPD);
+	at91_rtc_imr &= ~AT91_RTC_ACKUPD;
 
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_TIMR,
 			  bin2bcd(tm->tm_sec) << 0
@@ -142,7 +145,7 @@ static int at91_rtc_readalarm(struct dev
 	tm->tm_yday = rtc_year_days(tm->tm_mday, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_year);
 	tm->tm_year = at91_alarm_year - 1900;
 
-	alrm->enabled = (at91_rtc_read(AT91_RTC_IMR) & AT91_RTC_ALARM)
+	alrm->enabled = (at91_rtc_imr & AT91_RTC_ALARM)
 			? 1 : 0;
 
 	pr_debug("%s(): %4d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", __func__,
@@ -168,6 +171,7 @@ static int at91_rtc_setalarm(struct devi
 	tm.tm_sec = alrm->time.tm_sec;
 
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IDR, AT91_RTC_ALARM);
+	at91_rtc_imr &= ~AT91_RTC_ALARM;
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_TIMALR,
 		  bin2bcd(tm.tm_sec) << 0
 		| bin2bcd(tm.tm_min) << 8
@@ -180,6 +184,7 @@ static int at91_rtc_setalarm(struct devi
 
 	if (alrm->enabled) {
 		at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_SCCR, AT91_RTC_ALARM);
+		at91_rtc_imr |= AT91_RTC_ALARM;
 		at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IER, AT91_RTC_ALARM);
 	}
 
@@ -196,9 +201,12 @@ static int at91_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(str
 
 	if (enabled) {
 		at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_SCCR, AT91_RTC_ALARM);
+		at91_rtc_imr |= AT91_RTC_ALARM;
 		at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IER, AT91_RTC_ALARM);
-	} else
+	} else {
 		at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IDR, AT91_RTC_ALARM);
+		at91_rtc_imr &= ~AT91_RTC_ALARM;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -207,12 +215,10 @@ static int at91_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(str
  */
 static int at91_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
 {
-	unsigned long imr = at91_rtc_read(AT91_RTC_IMR);
-
 	seq_printf(seq, "update_IRQ\t: %s\n",
-			(imr & AT91_RTC_ACKUPD) ? "yes" : "no");
+			(at91_rtc_imr & AT91_RTC_ACKUPD) ? "yes" : "no");
 	seq_printf(seq, "periodic_IRQ\t: %s\n",
-			(imr & AT91_RTC_SECEV) ? "yes" : "no");
+			(at91_rtc_imr & AT91_RTC_SECEV) ? "yes" : "no");
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -227,7 +233,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_rtc_interrupt(in
 	unsigned int rtsr;
 	unsigned long events = 0;
 
-	rtsr = at91_rtc_read(AT91_RTC_SR) & at91_rtc_read(AT91_RTC_IMR);
+	rtsr = at91_rtc_read(AT91_RTC_SR) & at91_rtc_imr;
 	if (rtsr) {		/* this interrupt is shared!  Is it ours? */
 		if (rtsr & AT91_RTC_ALARM)
 			events |= (RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);
@@ -291,6 +297,7 @@ static int __init at91_rtc_probe(struct
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IDR, AT91_RTC_ACKUPD | AT91_RTC_ALARM |
 					AT91_RTC_SECEV | AT91_RTC_TIMEV |
 					AT91_RTC_CALEV);
+	at91_rtc_imr = 0;
 
 	ret = request_irq(irq, at91_rtc_interrupt,
 				IRQF_SHARED,
@@ -330,6 +337,7 @@ static int __exit at91_rtc_remove(struct
 	at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IDR, AT91_RTC_ACKUPD | AT91_RTC_ALARM |
 					AT91_RTC_SECEV | AT91_RTC_TIMEV |
 					AT91_RTC_CALEV);
+	at91_rtc_imr = 0;
 	free_irq(irq, pdev);
 
 	rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
@@ -342,31 +350,35 @@ static int __exit at91_rtc_remove(struct
 
 /* AT91RM9200 RTC Power management control */
 
-static u32 at91_rtc_imr;
+static u32 at91_rtc_bkpimr;
+
 
 static int at91_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
 	/* this IRQ is shared with DBGU and other hardware which isn't
 	 * necessarily doing PM like we are...
 	 */
-	at91_rtc_imr = at91_rtc_read(AT91_RTC_IMR)
-			& (AT91_RTC_ALARM|AT91_RTC_SECEV);
-	if (at91_rtc_imr) {
-		if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
+	at91_rtc_bkpimr = at91_rtc_imr & (AT91_RTC_ALARM|AT91_RTC_SECEV);
+	if (at91_rtc_bkpimr) {
+		if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
 			enable_irq_wake(irq);
-		else
-			at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IDR, at91_rtc_imr);
-	}
+		} else {
+			at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IDR, at91_rtc_bkpimr);
+			at91_rtc_imr &= ~at91_rtc_bkpimr;
+		}
+}
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int at91_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-	if (at91_rtc_imr) {
-		if (device_may_wakeup(dev))
+	if (at91_rtc_bkpimr) {
+		if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
 			disable_irq_wake(irq);
-		else
-			at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IER, at91_rtc_imr);
+		} else {
+			at91_rtc_imr |= at91_rtc_bkpimr;
+			at91_rtc_write(AT91_RTC_IER, at91_rtc_bkpimr);
+		}
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.h
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-at91rm9200.h
@@ -64,7 +64,6 @@
 #define	AT91_RTC_SCCR		0x1c			/* Status Clear Command Register */
 #define	AT91_RTC_IER		0x20			/* Interrupt Enable Register */
 #define	AT91_RTC_IDR		0x24			/* Interrupt Disable Register */
-#define	AT91_RTC_IMR		0x28			/* Interrupt Mask Register */
 
 #define	AT91_RTC_VER		0x2c			/* Valid Entry Register */
 #define		AT91_RTC_NVTIM		(1 <<  0)		/* Non valid Time */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ