lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130326224248.445263781@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:42:46 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>,
	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: [ 57/98] dm thin: fix discard corruption

3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>

commit f046f89a99ccfd9408b94c653374ff3065c7edb3 upstream.

Fix a bug in dm_btree_remove that could leave leaf values with incorrect
reference counts.  The effect of this was that removal of a shared block
could result in the space maps thinking the block was no longer used.
More concretely, if you have a thin device and a snapshot of it, sending
a discard to a shared region of the thin could corrupt the snapshot.

Thinp uses a 2-level nested btree to store it's mappings.  This first
level is indexed by thin device, and the second level by logical
block.

Often when we're removing an entry in this mapping tree we need to
rebalance nodes, which can involve shadowing them, possibly creating a
copy if the block is shared.  If we do create a copy then children of
that node need to have their reference counts incremented.  In this
way reference counts percolate down the tree as shared trees diverge.

The rebalance functions were incrementing the children at the
appropriate time, but they were always assuming the children were
internal nodes.  This meant the leaf values (in our case packed
block/flags entries) were not being incremented.

Signed-off-by: Joe Thornber <ejt@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/dm-thin.c                         |    4 +-
 drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c |   46 ++++++++++++++-------------
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-thin.c
@@ -2479,7 +2479,7 @@ static struct target_type pool_target =
 	.name = "thin-pool",
 	.features = DM_TARGET_SINGLETON | DM_TARGET_ALWAYS_WRITEABLE |
 		    DM_TARGET_IMMUTABLE,
-	.version = {1, 6, 1},
+	.version = {1, 7, 0},
 	.module = THIS_MODULE,
 	.ctr = pool_ctr,
 	.dtr = pool_dtr,
@@ -2766,7 +2766,7 @@ static int thin_iterate_devices(struct d
 
 static struct target_type thin_target = {
 	.name = "thin",
-	.version = {1, 7, 1},
+	.version = {1, 8, 0},
 	.module	= THIS_MODULE,
 	.ctr = thin_ctr,
 	.dtr = thin_dtr,
--- a/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
+++ b/drivers/md/persistent-data/dm-btree-remove.c
@@ -139,15 +139,8 @@ struct child {
 	struct btree_node *n;
 };
 
-static struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type = {
-	.context = NULL,
-	.size = sizeof(__le64),
-	.inc = NULL,
-	.dec = NULL,
-	.equal = NULL
-};
-
-static int init_child(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct btree_node *parent,
+static int init_child(struct dm_btree_info *info, struct dm_btree_value_type *vt,
+		      struct btree_node *parent,
 		      unsigned index, struct child *result)
 {
 	int r, inc;
@@ -164,7 +157,7 @@ static int init_child(struct dm_btree_in
 	result->n = dm_block_data(result->block);
 
 	if (inc)
-		inc_children(info->tm, result->n, &le64_type);
+		inc_children(info->tm, result->n, vt);
 
 	*((__le64 *) value_ptr(parent, index)) =
 		cpu_to_le64(dm_block_location(result->block));
@@ -236,7 +229,7 @@ static void __rebalance2(struct dm_btree
 }
 
 static int rebalance2(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
-		      unsigned left_index)
+		      struct dm_btree_value_type *vt, unsigned left_index)
 {
 	int r;
 	struct btree_node *parent;
@@ -244,11 +237,11 @@ static int rebalance2(struct shadow_spin
 
 	parent = dm_block_data(shadow_current(s));
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index, &left);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index, &left);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index + 1, &right);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index + 1, &right);
 	if (r) {
 		exit_child(info, &left);
 		return r;
@@ -368,7 +361,7 @@ static void __rebalance3(struct dm_btree
 }
 
 static int rebalance3(struct shadow_spine *s, struct dm_btree_info *info,
-		      unsigned left_index)
+		      struct dm_btree_value_type *vt, unsigned left_index)
 {
 	int r;
 	struct btree_node *parent = dm_block_data(shadow_current(s));
@@ -377,17 +370,17 @@ static int rebalance3(struct shadow_spin
 	/*
 	 * FIXME: fill out an array?
 	 */
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index, &left);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index, &left);
 	if (r)
 		return r;
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index + 1, &center);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index + 1, &center);
 	if (r) {
 		exit_child(info, &left);
 		return r;
 	}
 
-	r = init_child(info, parent, left_index + 2, &right);
+	r = init_child(info, vt, parent, left_index + 2, &right);
 	if (r) {
 		exit_child(info, &left);
 		exit_child(info, &center);
@@ -434,7 +427,8 @@ static int get_nr_entries(struct dm_tran
 }
 
 static int rebalance_children(struct shadow_spine *s,
-			      struct dm_btree_info *info, uint64_t key)
+			      struct dm_btree_info *info,
+			      struct dm_btree_value_type *vt, uint64_t key)
 {
 	int i, r, has_left_sibling, has_right_sibling;
 	uint32_t child_entries;
@@ -472,13 +466,13 @@ static int rebalance_children(struct sha
 	has_right_sibling = i < (le32_to_cpu(n->header.nr_entries) - 1);
 
 	if (!has_left_sibling)
-		r = rebalance2(s, info, i);
+		r = rebalance2(s, info, vt, i);
 
 	else if (!has_right_sibling)
-		r = rebalance2(s, info, i - 1);
+		r = rebalance2(s, info, vt, i - 1);
 
 	else
-		r = rebalance3(s, info, i - 1);
+		r = rebalance3(s, info, vt, i - 1);
 
 	return r;
 }
@@ -529,7 +523,7 @@ static int remove_raw(struct shadow_spin
 		if (le32_to_cpu(n->header.flags) & LEAF_NODE)
 			return do_leaf(n, key, index);
 
-		r = rebalance_children(s, info, key);
+		r = rebalance_children(s, info, vt, key);
 		if (r)
 			break;
 
@@ -550,6 +544,14 @@ static int remove_raw(struct shadow_spin
 	return r;
 }
 
+static struct dm_btree_value_type le64_type = {
+	.context = NULL,
+	.size = sizeof(__le64),
+	.inc = NULL,
+	.dec = NULL,
+	.equal = NULL
+};
+
 int dm_btree_remove(struct dm_btree_info *info, dm_block_t root,
 		    uint64_t *keys, dm_block_t *new_root)
 {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ