[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130326224245.358613221@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:42:17 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: [ 28/98] sfc: Only use TX push if a single descriptor is to be written
3.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
[ Upstream commit fae8563b25f73dc584a07bcda7a82750ff4f7672 ]
Using TX push when notifying the NIC of multiple new descriptors in
the ring will very occasionally cause the TX DMA engine to re-use an
old descriptor. This can result in a duplicated or partly duplicated
packet (new headers with old data), or an IOMMU page fault. This does
not happen when the pushed descriptor is the only one written.
TX push also provides little latency benefit when a packet requires
more than one descriptor.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/nic.c
@@ -376,7 +376,8 @@ efx_may_push_tx_desc(struct efx_tx_queue
return false;
tx_queue->empty_read_count = 0;
- return ((empty_read_count ^ write_count) & ~EFX_EMPTY_COUNT_VALID) == 0;
+ return ((empty_read_count ^ write_count) & ~EFX_EMPTY_COUNT_VALID) == 0
+ && tx_queue->write_count - write_count == 1;
}
/* For each entry inserted into the software descriptor ring, create a
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists