[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130326081704.GB11734@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:17:04 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linus.walleij@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mfd: db8500-prcmu: Fetch the PRCMU TCDM base address
from Device Tree
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> >> > res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >> > "prcmu-tcpm");
> >> > if (!res) {
> >> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >> > - "Error: no prcmu tcpm memory region provided\n");
> >> > - return;
> >> > - }
> >> > - tcpm_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> >> > + if (np) {
> >> > + tcpm_np = of_find_node_by_name(np->parent,
> >> > + "prcmu-tcpm-per4");
> >> > + if (!tcpm_np) {
> >> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> >> > + "no prcmu tcpm mem region provided\n");
> >> > + return;
> >> > + }
> >> > + tcpm_base = of_iomap(tcpm_np, 0);
> >> > + }
> >> > + } else
> >> > + tcpm_base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> >> > +
> >>
> >> Why don't you just add these extra registers to the prcmu node itself like
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi
> >> index 9de9309..6ee6c31 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi
> >> @@ -191,8 +191,8 @@
> >>
> >> prcmu: prcmu@...57000 {
> >> compatible = "stericsson,db8500-prcmu";
> >> - reg = <0x80157000 0x1000>;
> >> - reg-names = "prcmu";
> >> + reg = <0x80157000 0x1000>, <0x801b0000 0x1000>, <0x801b8000 0x1000>;
> >> + reg-names = "prcmu", "prcmu-tcpm", "prcmu-tcdm-per4";
> >> interrupts = <0 47 0x4>;
> >> #address-cells = <1>;
> >> #size-cells = <1>;
> >>
> >>
> >> and document those in the prcmu binding?
> >>
> >> That would keep the code simpler and the same for both cases.
> >
> > I'm not sure you can. These addresses differ from platform to
> > platform, so I'd need to provide the base PRCMU address in
> > dbx5x0.dtsi, then the other two in the dts files. Can you do that?
>
> Better ask on devicetree-discuss.
>
> What it reflects are differences between SoC:s, so I think the
> right solution is to split it in a three-layer cake:
>
> dbx5x0.dtsi -> included by
> db8500.dtsi -> included by
> snowball/hrefv60plus.dts
>
> dbx5x0.dtsi -> included by
> dbx540.dtsi -> included by
> ccu9540/ccu8540.dts
>
> Here you may insert the reg property into the node at the
> db8500.dtsi or dbx540.dtsi layer.
It's easy done, if that's the right way.
> If you prefer I can cook a patch...
... and I'm fine to do it.
[5 mins later]
Hmm... it appears that in STE's kernel, the same address is used for
all SoCs:
#define U8500_PRCMU_TCDM_BASE (U8500_PER4_BASE + 0x68000)
However, in Mainline there is another definition:
#define U9540_PRCMU_TCDM_BASE (U8500_PER4_BASE + 0x6A000)
... which doesn't seem to be in use anywhere - even for the u9540.
What's the deal big-man?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists