linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201303261022.39882.arnd@arndb.de>
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 10:22:39 +0000
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for 3.9-rc #2

On Tuesday 26 March 2013, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another "fixes" pull-request for AT91 on top of material that you have already
> taken. Fixes are manly typos but the bad node declaration and some misspelling
> can cause confusion.

Hi Nicolas,

I'd prefer to take only fixes for serious bugs into 3.9 now, since I have
already sent the fixes for -rc5. As far as I can tell, the macb node patch
is the only one that falls into that category, but for that one, I'd
prefer if it could be redone in a simpler way, by replacing

+       ahb {
+               apb {
+                       macb0: ethernet@...2c000 {
+                               phy-mode = "rmii";
+                               status = "okay";
+                       };
+               };
+       };


with

	@macb0 {
		phy-mode = "rmii";
		status = "okay";
	}

as there is no need to provide the full path when you already have
a label for the device.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/