linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] lib/scatterlist: sg_page_iter: support for memory w/o backing pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:50:20 +0100
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
Cc:	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] lib/scatterlist: sg_page_iter: support for memory
 w/o backing pages

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:14:17PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> When adding sg_page_iter I haven't thought properly through the use case
> for sg lists w/o backing pages - which is specific to the i915 driver -
> so this patchset adds support for this.
> 
> It applies on the i915 tree [1], where the iterator is in use already.
> 
> [1] git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel [nightly branch]

i915 patches are already included in linux-next, so should apply on top of
that, too. So can this go in through -mm for 3.10 or should I slurp it in
through drm-intel trees (once it passes review)? I'd like to ditch the
dummy page hack we're currently using (i.e. patch 2).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/