linux-kernel - [PATCH 140/150] netconsole: don't call __netpoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1364311249-14454-141-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:20:39 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 140/150] netconsole: don't call __netpoll_cleanup() while atomic

3.5.7.9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>

commit 3f315bef23075ea8a98a6fe4221a83b83456d970 upstream.

__netpoll_cleanup() is called in netconsole_netdev_event() while holding a
spinlock. Release/acquire the spinlock before/after it and restart the
loop. Also, disable the netconsole completely, because we won't have chance
after the restart of the loop, and might end up in a situation where
nt->enabled == 1 and nt->np.dev == NULL.

Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/net/netconsole.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
index 63ffbdf..2524a69 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
@@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ static int netconsole_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
 		goto done;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&target_list_lock, flags);
+restart:
 	list_for_each_entry(nt, &target_list, list) {
 		netconsole_target_get(nt);
 		if (nt->np.dev == dev) {
@@ -638,20 +639,17 @@ static int netconsole_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *this,
 			case NETDEV_UNREGISTER:
 				/*
 				 * rtnl_lock already held
+				 * we might sleep in __netpoll_cleanup()
 				 */
-				if (nt->np.dev) {
-					spin_unlock_irqrestore(
-							      &target_list_lock,
-							      flags);
-					__netpoll_cleanup(&nt->np);
-					spin_lock_irqsave(&target_list_lock,
-							  flags);
-					dev_put(nt->np.dev);
-					nt->np.dev = NULL;
-				}
+				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&target_list_lock, flags);
+				__netpoll_cleanup(&nt->np);
+				spin_lock_irqsave(&target_list_lock, flags);
+				dev_put(nt->np.dev);
+				nt->np.dev = NULL;
 				nt->enabled = 0;
 				stopped = true;
-				break;
+				netconsole_target_put(nt);
+				goto restart;
 			}
 		}
 		netconsole_target_put(nt);
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/