linux-kernel - Re: Driver lis3lv02d_i2c not working on Nokia RX-51

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwYvq5fZawbDVDPBu0ox2W7DQf5JmmyQHJYpBTOOTu_nQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 09:08:08 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	Eric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: Driver lis3lv02d_i2c not working on Nokia RX-51

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 04:02:39PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
>
>> What do you think how to fix this problem? I do not know about any
>> HW regulator for n900 accelerometer and possible solutions could
>> be revert that commit or adding fake regulator to board code...
>
> Reverting the fix is not an option, this is a clear bug in the platform.
>
> There will be a regulator here, the device needs power.

Bullshit.

This is a regression, and it needs to be fixed. The "device needs
power" crap is just that - crap. Nobody cares. OF COURSE all devices
need power, but that is totally irrelevant for a driver. The SSD in my
system "needs power", but I have absolutely zero regulator information
for it NOR DO I F*CKING NEED ANY!

Claiming that we need to know the power regulator for an accelerometer
is total utter idiocy and crap.

I'm going to revert that commit unless you can fix it some other way
(dummy regulators when you can't find a real one or whatever). The
notion that you have to have regulator information in order to use
some random device is insanity. I don't understand how you can even
start to make excuses like that. It's so obviously bogus that it's not
even funny.

Why do I have to explain the "no regressions" to long-time kernel
maintainers EVERY SINGLE RELEASE? What the f*ck is *wrong* with you
people? Seriously?

          Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/