lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:18:53 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 034/150] perf,x86: fix kernel crash with PEBS/BTS after suspend/resume

3.5.7.9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>

commit 1d9d8639c063caf6efc2447f5f26aa637f844ff6 upstream.

This patch fixes a kernel crash when using precise sampling (PEBS)
after a suspend/resume. Turns out the CPU notifier code is not invoked
on CPU0 (BP). Therefore, the DS_AREA (used by PEBS) is not restored properly
by the kernel and keeps it power-on/resume value of 0 causing any PEBS
measurement to crash when running on CPU0.

The workaround is to add a hook in the actual resume code to restore
the DS Area MSR value. It is invoked for all CPUS. So for all but CPU0,
the DS_AREA will be restored twice but this is harmless.

Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/power/cpu.c                      | 2 ++
 include/linux/perf_event.h                | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 35e2192..9a9be1e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -714,3 +714,11 @@ void intel_ds_init(void)
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+void perf_restore_debug_store(void)
+{
+	if (!x86_pmu.bts && !x86_pmu.pebs)
+		return;
+
+	init_debug_store_on_cpu(smp_processor_id());
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
index 218cdb1..fcbaac60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/power/cpu.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/suspend.h>
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
 
 #include <asm/pgtable.h>
 #include <asm/proto.h>
@@ -227,6 +228,7 @@ static void __restore_processor_state(struct saved_context *ctxt)
 	do_fpu_end();
 	x86_platform.restore_sched_clock_state();
 	mtrr_bp_restore();
+	perf_restore_debug_store();
 }
 
 /* Needed by apm.c */
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index c3c98a6..1d56bf6 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1295,6 +1295,7 @@ extern void perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(int rctx);
 extern void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event);
 extern void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event);
 extern void perf_event_task_tick(void);
+extern void perf_restore_debug_store(void);
 #else
 static inline void
 perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
@@ -1333,6 +1334,7 @@ static inline void perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(int rctx)		{ }
 static inline void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event)		{ }
 static inline void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event)		{ }
 static inline void perf_event_task_tick(void)				{ }
+static inline void perf_restore_debug_store(void)			{ }
 #endif
 
 #define perf_output_put(handle, x) perf_output_copy((handle), &(x), sizeof(x))
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ