[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130326224536.GA29952@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:45:36 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: zsmalloc: Fix link error on ARM
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:33:52PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Testing the arm chromebook config against the upstream
> kernel produces a linker error for the zsmalloc module from
> staging. The symbol flush_tlb_kernel_range is not available
> there. Fix this by removing the reimplementation of
> unmap_kernel_range in the zsmalloc module and using the
> function directly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Why is this not an error for any other architecture? Why is arm
special?
> ---
> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 5 +----
> mm/vmalloc.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> index e78d262..324e123 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> @@ -656,11 +656,8 @@ static inline void __zs_unmap_object(struct mapping_area *area,
> struct page *pages[2], int off, int size)
> {
> unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)area->vm_addr;
> - unsigned long end = addr + (PAGE_SIZE * 2);
>
> - flush_cache_vunmap(addr, end);
> - unmap_kernel_range_noflush(addr, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> - flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
> + unmap_kernel_range(addr, PAGE_SIZE * 2);
> }
>
> #else /* USE_PGTABLE_MAPPING */
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 0f751f2..f7cba11 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -1266,6 +1266,7 @@ void unmap_kernel_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
> vunmap_page_range(addr, end);
> flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, end);
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unmap_kernel_range);
I _really_ don't like adding core exports for a staging driver, there is
no guarantee that the staging driver will not just be deleted tomorrow.
So, if at all possible, I don't want to do this.
Perhaps, just make it so the staging code can't be a module?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists