linux-kernel - [ 47/49] exec: use -ELOOP for max recursion depth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:01:44 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	halfdog <me@...fdog.net>, P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Subject: [ 47/49] exec: use -ELOOP for max recursion depth

3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

commit d740269867021faf4ce38a449353d2b986c34a67 upstream.

To avoid an explosion of request_module calls on a chain of abusive
scripts, fail maximum recursion with -ELOOP instead of -ENOEXEC. As soon
as maximum recursion depth is hit, the error will fail all the way back
up the chain, aborting immediately.

This also has the side-effect of stopping the user's shell from attempting
to reexecute the top-level file as a shell script. As seen in the
dash source:

        if (cmd != path_bshell && errno == ENOEXEC) {
                *argv-- = cmd;
                *argv = cmd = path_bshell;
                goto repeat;
        }

The above logic was designed for running scripts automatically that lacked
the "#!" header, not to re-try failed recursion. On a legitimate -ENOEXEC,
things continue to behave as the shell expects.

Additionally, when tracking recursion, the binfmt handlers should not be
involved. The recursion being tracked is the depth of calls through
search_binary_handler(), so that function should be exclusively responsible
for tracking the depth.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: halfdog <me@...fdog.net>
Cc: P J P <ppandit@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/binfmt_em86.c        |    1 -
 fs/binfmt_misc.c        |    6 ------
 fs/binfmt_script.c      |    4 +---
 fs/exec.c               |   10 +++++-----
 include/linux/binfmts.h |    2 --
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/binfmt_em86.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_em86.c
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@ static int load_em86(struct linux_binprm
 			return -ENOEXEC;
 	}
 
-	bprm->recursion_depth++; /* Well, the bang-shell is implicit... */
 	allow_write_access(bprm->file);
 	fput(bprm->file);
 	bprm->file = NULL;
--- a/fs/binfmt_misc.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_misc.c
@@ -116,10 +116,6 @@ static int load_misc_binary(struct linux
 	if (!enabled)
 		goto _ret;
 
-	retval = -ENOEXEC;
-	if (bprm->recursion_depth > BINPRM_MAX_RECURSION)
-		goto _ret;
-
 	/* to keep locking time low, we copy the interpreter string */
 	read_lock(&entries_lock);
 	fmt = check_file(bprm);
@@ -200,8 +196,6 @@ static int load_misc_binary(struct linux
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto _error;
 
-	bprm->recursion_depth++;
-
 	retval = search_binary_handler (bprm, regs);
 	if (retval < 0)
 		goto _error;
--- a/fs/binfmt_script.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_script.c
@@ -22,15 +22,13 @@ static int load_script(struct linux_binp
 	char interp[BINPRM_BUF_SIZE];
 	int retval;
 
-	if ((bprm->buf[0] != '#') || (bprm->buf[1] != '!') ||
-	    (bprm->recursion_depth > BINPRM_MAX_RECURSION))
+	if ((bprm->buf[0] != '#') || (bprm->buf[1] != '!'))
 		return -ENOEXEC;
 	/*
 	 * This section does the #! interpretation.
 	 * Sorta complicated, but hopefully it will work.  -TYT
 	 */
 
-	bprm->recursion_depth++;
 	allow_write_access(bprm->file);
 	fput(bprm->file);
 	bprm->file = NULL;
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1369,6 +1369,10 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
 	int try,retval;
 	struct linux_binfmt *fmt;
 
+	/* This allows 4 levels of binfmt rewrites before failing hard. */
+	if (depth > 5)
+		return -ELOOP;
+
 	retval = security_bprm_check(bprm);
 	if (retval)
 		return retval;
@@ -1387,12 +1391,8 @@ int search_binary_handler(struct linux_b
 			if (!try_module_get(fmt->module))
 				continue;
 			read_unlock(&binfmt_lock);
+			bprm->recursion_depth = depth + 1;
 			retval = fn(bprm, regs);
-			/*
-			 * Restore the depth counter to its starting value
-			 * in this call, so we don't have to rely on every
-			 * load_binary function to restore it on return.
-			 */
 			bprm->recursion_depth = depth;
 			if (retval >= 0) {
 				if (depth == 0)
--- a/include/linux/binfmts.h
+++ b/include/linux/binfmts.h
@@ -67,8 +67,6 @@ struct linux_binprm {
 #define BINPRM_FLAGS_EXECFD_BIT 1
 #define BINPRM_FLAGS_EXECFD (1 << BINPRM_FLAGS_EXECFD_BIT)
 
-#define BINPRM_MAX_RECURSION 4
-
 /* Function parameter for binfmt->coredump */
 struct coredump_params {
 	long signr;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/