[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364374274.5053.60.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:51:14 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, pjt@...gle.com, santosh.shilimkar@...com,
morten.rasmussen@....com, chander.kashyap@...aro.org,
cmetcalf@...era.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
len.brown@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] sched: pack small tasks
On Wed, 2013-03-27 at 12:48 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
>
> Yes, the new forked runnable load was set as full utilisation in V5
> power aware scheduling. PJT, Mike and I both agree on this. PJT just
> discussion how to give the full load to new forked task. and we get
> agreement in my coming V6 power aware scheduling patchset.
Great!, means I can mark the v5 thread read! :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists