[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1364389729-17559-18-git-send-email-philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:08:49 +0100
From: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>,
Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/17] drbd: fix if(); found by kbuild test robot
From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
Recently introduced al_begin_io_nonblock() was returning -EBUSY,
even when it should return -EWOULDBLOCK.
Impact:
A few spurious wake_up() calls in prepare_al_transaction_nonblock().
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@...bit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...bit.com>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c
index 6afe173..6608076 100644
--- a/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c
+++ b/drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ int drbd_al_begin_io_nonblock(struct drbd_conf *mdev, struct drbd_interval *i)
if (unlikely(tmp != NULL)) {
struct bm_extent *bm_ext = lc_entry(tmp, struct bm_extent, lce);
if (test_bit(BME_NO_WRITES, &bm_ext->flags)) {
- if (!test_and_set_bit(BME_PRIORITY, &bm_ext->flags));
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(BME_PRIORITY, &bm_ext->flags))
return -EBUSY;
return -EWOULDBLOCK;
}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists