linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:53:25 +0100
From:	"PaX Team" <pageexec@...email.hu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
CC:	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 150/150] kernel/signal.c: use __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER instead of SA_RESTORER

sorry if you got this twice, had smtpd problems...

On 26 Mar 2013 at 15:20, Luis Henriques wrote:

> 3.5.7.9 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ------------------
> 
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> 
> commit 522cff142d7d2f9230839c9e1f21a4d8bcc22a4a upstream.
> 
> __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER is the preferred conditional for use in 3.9 and
> later kernels, per Kees.

does __ARCH_HAS_SA_RESTORER exist in the 3.5 stable series at all? i thought it
was new to 3.9...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/