[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51531BF9.8020405@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:19:05 +0100
From: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Add pciehp_surprise module option
On 27.3.2013 17:11, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Friday 22 March 2013 10:20:43 Alex Williamson wrote:
>
>>> (*) It would probably make more sense to have a list of dmi strings,
>>> because it's the PCIe controller that does not set the capability bit
>>> when it should. The device (Realtek card reader in this case) seems to
>>> behave correctly. The machines in question have been laptops or
>>> all-in-one PCs so far, so there should be no problem with dmi matches.
>>
>> Yep, I think that makes sense, leave the global option for debugging but
>> fix individual known broken devices through dmi quirks. Thanks,
>
> I checked with Win8 and it does ignore the surprise attribute.
I.e., the device hotplugs / hotremoves even in a pristine Win8 install
that does not include any driver for the device.
Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists