[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51531C50.1010106@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 11:20:32 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] [RFC] arm: use PSCI if available
On 03/27/2013 08:35 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 27/03/13 12:50, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Check for the presence of PSCI before setting smp_ops, use PSCI if it is
>> available.
>>
>> This is useful because at least when running on Xen it's possible to have a
>> PSCI node for example on a Versatile Express or an Exynos5 machine. In these
>> cases the PSCI SMP calls should be the ones to be called.
>>
>> Remove virt_smp_ops and platsmp.c from mach-virt because they aren't needed
>> anymore.
[...]
>> +static void __cpuinit psci_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu)
>> +{
>> + gic_secondary_init(0);
>> +}
>
> So here we end-up with a dependency between SMP, PSCI, and GIC.
> I really can't see that being a good idea, even I like the general
> direction of this series.
>
The GIC dependency should be removed with Catalin's series to use
notifiers for GIC cpu interface init.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists