lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:07:03 -0500
From:	Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <x86@...nel.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] perf, x86: Allow for multiple kfree_on_online pointers

Currently only 1 pointer can be freed using kfree_on_online mechanism,
allow for multiple.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |    7 +++++--
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |    3 ++-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c   |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index bf0f01a..64c4b7a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -1258,10 +1258,12 @@ x86_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 	unsigned int cpu = (long)hcpu;
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
 	int ret = NOTIFY_OK;
+	int i;
 
 	switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
 	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
-		cpuc->kfree_on_online = NULL;
+		for (i = 0; i < MAX_KFREE_ON_ONLINE; i++)
+			cpuc->kfree_on_online[i] = NULL;
 		if (x86_pmu.cpu_prepare)
 			ret = x86_pmu.cpu_prepare(cpu);
 		break;
@@ -1274,7 +1276,8 @@ x86_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 		break;
 
 	case CPU_ONLINE:
-		kfree(cpuc->kfree_on_online);
+		for (i = 0; i < MAX_KFREE_ON_ONLINE; i++)
+			kfree(cpuc->kfree_on_online[i]);
 		break;
 
 	case CPU_DYING:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index fdaac69..770f3b99 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct intel_shared_regs {
 };
 
 #define MAX_LBR_ENTRIES		16
+#define MAX_KFREE_ON_ONLINE	4
 
 struct cpu_hw_events {
 	/*
@@ -167,7 +168,7 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
 	/* Inverted mask of bits to clear in the perf_ctr ctrl registers */
 	u64				perf_ctr_virt_mask;
 
-	void				*kfree_on_online;
+	void				*kfree_on_online[MAX_KFREE_ON_ONLINE];
 };
 
 #define __EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, m, w, o) {\
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 23964a6..36b5162 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 			continue;
 
 		if (nb->id == nb_id) {
-			cpuc->kfree_on_online = cpuc->amd_nb;
+			cpuc->kfree_on_online[0] = cpuc->amd_nb;
 			cpuc->amd_nb = nb;
 			break;
 		}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index dab7580..f79a0c5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1719,7 +1719,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 
 			pc = per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, i).shared_regs;
 			if (pc && pc->core_id == core_id) {
-				cpuc->kfree_on_online = cpuc->shared_regs;
+				cpuc->kfree_on_online[0] = cpuc->shared_regs;
 				cpuc->shared_regs = pc;
 				break;
 			}
-- 
1.7.9.5


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ