linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] sched: pack small tasks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51527A08.8060207@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:48:08 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, pjt@...gle.com, santosh.shilimkar@...com,
	morten.rasmussen@....com, chander.kashyap@...aro.org,
	cmetcalf@...era.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	len.brown@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
	amit.kucheria@...aro.org, corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] sched: pack small tasks

On 03/27/2013 12:33 PM, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> 
> On 03/26/2013 06:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Fri, 2013-03-22 at 13:25 +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>> +static bool is_light_task(struct task_struct *p)
>>> +{
>>> +       /* A light task runs less than 20% in average */
>>> +       return ((p->se.avg.runnable_avg_sum  * 5) <
>>> +                       (p->se.avg.runnable_avg_period));
>>> +}
>>
>> OK, so we have a 'problem' here, we initialize runnable_avg_* to 0, but
>> we want to 'assume' a fresh task is fully 'loaded'. IIRC Alex ran into
>> this as well.
>>
>> PJT, do you have any sane solution for this, I forgot what the result
>> of the last discussion was -- was there any?
> 
> The conclusion after last discussion between PJT and Alex was that the
> load contribution of a fresh task be set to "full" during "__sched_fork()".
> 
> task->se.avg.load_avg_contrib = task->se.load.weight during
> __sched_fork() is reflected in the latest power aware scheduler patchset
> by Alex.

Yes, the new forked runnable load was set as full utilisation in V5
power aware scheduling. PJT, Mike and I both agree on this. PJT just
discussion how to give the full load to new forked task. and we get
agreement in my coming V6 power aware scheduling patchset.

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Regards
> Preeti U Murthy
>>
> 


-- 
Thanks Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/