linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] extcon: max77693: Fix return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK9yfHx2y7LTu1G6=6EDybOZdV_Tk2r=RbvEH58J3mQC0DfZJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:11:25 +0530
From:	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
To:	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] extcon: max77693: Fix return value

Hi Chanwoo,

On 28 March 2013 04:51, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com> wrote:
> On 03/27/2013 08:23 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>> Return the value obtained from the function instead of hardcoding.
>> Silences the following warning:
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77693.c:297 max77693_muic_set_path()
>> info: why not propagate 'ret' from max77693_update_reg() instead of (-11)?
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-max77693.c:310 max77693_muic_set_path()
>> info: why not propagate 'ret' from max77693_update_reg() instead of (-11)?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
[snip]

>>       dev_info(info->dev,
> As my comment about "extcon: max8997: Fix return value",
> I wish to receive one patch which modify all of return value with 'ret'
> in extcon-max77693.c.

Resent both patches as per your suggestion.


-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/