[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1364457537-15114-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:58:51 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] optimization, clean-up, correctness about fair.c
There is no unified subject for this patchset.
Patch 1 is for removing one division operation with multiplication.
Patch 2,3 is for clean-up related to load_balance(), there is improvement
in terms of code size and IMO, readability may be also improved.
Patch 4,5 is for correctness about sched_slice()
Feel free to give a comment for this patchset.
It's based on v3.9-rc4 and top of my previous patchset. But, perhaps,
it may not really depend on my previous patchset. :)
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/28
"[PATCH v2 0/6] correct load_balance()"
Thanks.
Joonsoo Kim (5):
sched: remove one division operation in find_buiest_queue()
sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
sched: clean-up struct sd_lb_stat
sched: don't consider upper se in sched_slice()
sched: limit sched_slice if it is more than sysctl_sched_latency
kernel/sched/fair.c | 347 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 171 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists