[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130328143227.61B0CE0085@blue.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:32:27 +0200 (EET)
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dave <dave@...1.net>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2, RFC 16/30] thp: handle file pages in split_huge_page()
Dave wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:50 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > +static int split_anon_huge_page(struct page *page)
> > {
> > struct anon_vma *anon_vma;
> > int ret = 1;
> >
> > - BUG_ON(is_huge_zero_pfn(page_to_pfn(page)));
> > - BUG_ON(!PageAnon(page));
>
> Did you really mean to kill these BUG_ON()s? They still look relevant
> to me.
The zero page BUG_ON() is moved to new split_huge_page().
!PageAnon(page) we now can handle.
Note: nobody should call split_anon_huge_page() directly, only
split_huge_page().
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists