linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: irq: Call irqchit_init if no init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:51:55 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: irq: Call irqchit_init if no init_irq
	function is specified

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 09:48:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 04:41 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > +	if (machine_desc->init_irq)
> > +		machine_desc->init_irq();
> > +	else
> > +		irqchip_init();
> 
> There needs to be an empty version defined for !OF.

Better:

#ifdef CONFIG_OF
	if (!machine_desc->init_irq)
		irqchip_init();
	else
#endif
		machine_desc->init_irq();

which means we don't even get the test if !OF, and if someone mistakenly
sets this to NULL for a !OF platform, they get to know about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/