[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <515459D8.4010001@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:55:20 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: palmas: add dt support
On 03/27/2013 11:59 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 March 2013 06:30 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Laxman Dewangan
>> <ldewangan@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> +static struct of_device_id of_palmas_gpio_match[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "ti,palmas-gpio"},
>>> + { },
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_palmas_gpio_match);
>>> +#endif
>>
>> But please drop the #ifdef here unless it causes compile errors
>> (I don't think it will.)
>>
>
> I am using this table as
>
> driver.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(of_palmas_gpio_match),
> of_match_ptr is macro which is NULL in case of CONFIG_OF not defined.
> So if I remove ifdefs then it may create build warning as unused variable.
I think Linus's point is that you can simply remove the use of
of_match_ptr(). The only disadvantage of doing so is that the table will
always be included in the object file, but it's so small that it's
probably not worth worrying about.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists