[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51545EB0.7020600@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 16:16:00 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tty: mxser: improve error handling in mxser_probe()
and mxser_module_init()
Hi, back from Rome, I suppose ;).
On 02/19/2013 06:57 AM, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> 1. Currently mxser_probe() and mxser_module_init() ignore errors
> that can happen in tty_port_register_device().
> 2. mxser_module_init() does not deallocate resources allocated in mxser_get_ISA_conf()
> if mxser_initbrd() failed.
>
> The patch adds proper error handling in all the cases.
> Also it moves free_irq() from mxser_release_ISA_res() to mxser_board_remove(),
> since it makes mxser_release_ISA_res() a counterpart for mxser_get_ISA_conf(),
> while free_irq() is relevant to both ISA and PCI boards.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
> ---
> drivers/tty/mxser.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/mxser.c b/drivers/tty/mxser.c
> index 4011386..deeb5ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/mxser.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/mxser.c
> @@ -2364,7 +2364,6 @@ static void mxser_release_vector(struct mxser_board *brd)
>
> static void mxser_release_ISA_res(struct mxser_board *brd)
> {
> - free_irq(brd->irq, brd);
> release_region(brd->ports[0].ioaddr, 8 * brd->info->nports);
> mxser_release_vector(brd);
> }
> @@ -2430,6 +2429,7 @@ static void mxser_board_remove(struct mxser_board *brd)
> tty_unregister_device(mxvar_sdriver, brd->idx + i);
> tty_port_destroy(&brd->ports[i].port);
> }
> + free_irq(brd->irq, brd);
> }
>
> static int __init mxser_get_ISA_conf(int cap, struct mxser_board *brd)
> @@ -2554,6 +2554,7 @@ static int mxser_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> struct mxser_board *brd;
> unsigned int i, j;
> unsigned long ioaddress;
> + struct device *tty_dev;
> int retval = -EINVAL;
>
> for (i = 0; i < MXSER_BOARDS; i++)
> @@ -2637,13 +2638,25 @@ static int mxser_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> if (retval)
> goto err_rel3;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < brd->info->nports; i++)
> - tty_port_register_device(&brd->ports[i].port, mxvar_sdriver,
> - brd->idx + i, &pdev->dev);
> + for (i = 0; i < brd->info->nports; i++) {
> + tty_dev = tty_port_register_device(&brd->ports[i].port,
> + mxvar_sdriver, brd->idx + i, &pdev->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(tty_dev)) {
> + retval = PTR_ERR(tty_dev);
> + for (; i > 0; i--)
To me, it seems that v1 of the patch was merged. Could you fix this up?
[Coverity revealed this.]
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists