linux-kernel - [PATCH -mm -next] ipc,sem: untangle RCU locking with find_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:32:22 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, davidlohr.bueso@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	hhuang@...hat.com, jason.low2@...com, walken@...gle.com,
	lwoodman@...hat.com, chegu_vinod@...com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH -mm -next] ipc,sem: untangle RCU locking with
 find_alloc_undo

On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 13:33:07 -0400
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:

> [   96.347341] ================================================
> [   96.348085] [ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]
> [   96.348834] 3.9.0-rc4-next-20130326-sasha-00011-gbcb2313 #318 Tainted: G        W
> [   96.360300] ------------------------------------------------
> [   96.361084] trinity-child9/7583 is leaving the kernel with locks still held!
> [   96.362019] 1 lock held by trinity-child9/7583:
> [   96.362610]  #0:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8192eafb>] SYSC_semtimedop+0x1fb/0xec0
> 
> It seems that we can leave semtimedop without releasing the rcu read lock.

Sasha, this patch untangles the RCU locking with find_alloc_undo,
and should fix the above issue. As a side benefit, this makes the
code a little cleaner.

Next up: implement locking in a way that does not trigger any 
lockdep warnings...

---8<---

Subject: ipc,sem: untangle RCU locking with find_alloc_undo

The ipc semaphore code has a nasty RCU locking tangle, with both
find_alloc_undo and semtimedop taking the rcu_read_lock(). The
code can be cleaned up somewhat by only taking the rcu_read_lock
once.

The only caller of find_alloc_undo is in semtimedop.

This should solve the trinity issue reported by Sasha Levin.

Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
---
 ipc/sem.c |   31 +++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f46441a..2ec2945 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -1646,22 +1646,23 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
 			alter = 1;
 	}
 
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tasks);
+
 	if (undos) {
+		/* On success, find_alloc_undo takes the rcu_read_lock */
 		un = find_alloc_undo(ns, semid);
 		if (IS_ERR(un)) {
 			error = PTR_ERR(un);
 			goto out_free;
 		}
-	} else
+	} else {
 		un = NULL;
+		rcu_read_lock();
+	}
 
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tasks);
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	sma = sem_obtain_object_check(ns, semid);
 	if (IS_ERR(sma)) {
-		if (un)
-			rcu_read_unlock();
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		error = PTR_ERR(sma);
 		goto out_free;
 	}
@@ -1693,22 +1694,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
 	 */
 	error = -EIDRM;
 	locknum = sem_lock(sma, sops, nsops);
-	if (un) {
-		if (un->semid == -1) {
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-			goto out_unlock_free;
-		} else {
-			/*
-			 * rcu lock can be released, "un" cannot disappear:
-			 * - sem_lock is acquired, thus IPC_RMID is
-			 *   impossible.
-			 * - exit_sem is impossible, it always operates on
-			 *   current (or a dead task).
-			 */
-
-			rcu_read_unlock();
-		}
-	}
+	if (un && un->semid == -1)
+		goto out_unlock_free;
 
 	error = try_atomic_semop (sma, sops, nsops, un, task_tgid_vnr(current));
 	if (error <= 0) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/