[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364492646.10629.1.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 13:44:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas de Pesloüan
<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Guy Streeter <streeter@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Crash with NULL pointer dereference in bond_handle_frame
in -rt (possibly mainline)
On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 10:29 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Nothing :(
>
> bug introduced in commit 35d48903e9781975e823b359ee85c257c9ff5c1c
> (bonding: fix rx_handler locking)
>
> CC Jiri
>
> Fix seems simple :
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index 6bbd90e..7956ca5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -1457,6 +1457,8 @@ static rx_handler_result_t bond_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> *pskb = skb;
>
> slave = bond_slave_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> + if (!slave)
> + return ret;
Thanks! That's basically what I thought, but wanted to make sure there's
wasn't some other synchronization that I may have been missing.
-- Steve
> bond = slave->bond;
>
> if (bond->params.arp_interval)
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists