[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5154985D.9050001@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:22:05 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
CC: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] rwsem: simplify rwsem_down_read_failed
On 03/15/2013 06:54 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> When trying to acquire a read lock, the RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS adjustment
> doesn't cause other readers to block, so we never have to worry about waking
> them back after canceling this adjustment in rwsem_down_read_failed().
>
> We also never want to steal the lock in rwsem_down_read_failed(), so we
> don't have to grab the wait_lock either.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists