[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1364500058-epefjxd9-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:47:38 -0400
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hugetlbfs: stop setting VM_DONTDUMP in initializing
vma(VM_HUGETLB)
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:39:01PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:04:29PM -0400, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> [...]
> > I guess you mean this patch violates one/both of these rules:
> >
> > - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
> > marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
> > security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue. In short, something
> > critical.
> > - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream).
> >
> > I'm not sure if the problem "we can't get any hugepage in coredump"
> > is considered as 'some "oh, that's not good" issue'.
> > But yes, it's not a critical one.
> > If you mean I violated the second rule, sorry, I'll get it into upstream first.
>
> The second rule is the clear one. If you are submitting a patch to
> a subsystem maintainer and you want it to go into stable branches as
> well, you must put 'Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org' in the commit message,
> not just the mail header.
Got it. Thank you.
Naoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists