[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5153C76E.3050203@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:30:38 +0800
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>
CC: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: zsmalloc zbud hybrid design discussion?
On 03/28/2013 04:04 AM, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> Seth and all zproject folks --
>
> I've been giving some deep thought as to how a zpage
> allocator might be designed that would incorporate the
> best of both zsmalloc and zbud.
>
> Rather than dive into coding, it occurs to me that the
> best chance of success would be if all interested parties
> could first discuss (on-list) and converge on a design
> that we can all agree on. If we achieve that, I don't
> care who writes the code and/or gets the credit or
> chooses the name. If we can't achieve consensus, at
> least it will be much clearer where our differences lie.
>
> Any thoughts?
Can't agree more!
Hoping we would agree on a design dealing well with
density/fragmentation/pageframe-reclaim and better integration with MM.
And then working together to implement it.
--
Regards,
-Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists