[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130329173100.GV30923@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:31:00 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...mer.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 03:12:03PM +0100, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Remove the use of a tasklet to start the DMA channel when issue_pending is
> called.
> The use of tasklet delays the DMA start which can cause issues at drivers,
> for example the audio drivers expect that the DMA is started right away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> Hi Russell,
>
> I know you are against removing the tasklet since you have planed to move the
> omap-dma to use runtime/dynamic DMA channel use.
> I have looked at the amba-pl08x.c driver which is doing that exactly (as you
> pointed out that to me). AMBA did not use tasklet either and I'm sure we can
> change the omap-dma driver to do the same in a same way as we could have done it
> with the tasklet use.
It's rather sad that you're ignoring what I'm saying, and going by what
another DMA engine driver - which is self contained - is doing, rather
than listening to my arguments against that approach.
I think in return I'll just ignore this patch, showing you the same
respect you show me. Congratuations.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists