[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130329174003.GA9862@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 10:40:03 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: pjt@...gle.com, paul.mckenney@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com,
charles.garcia-tobin@....com, Arvind.Chauhan@....com,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/7] workqueue: Add helpers to schedule work on any cpu
Hello, Viresh.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:57:23PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 March 2013 23:43, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Viresh, would it be difficult to make another measurement of the same
> > workload with the said workqueues converted to unbound? I think that
> > would at least provide a nice reference point.
>
> My heart is shattered after getting the results :)
>
>
> Cluster A15 Energy Cluster A7 Energy Total
> ------------------------- ----------------------- ------
>
> Without this patchset (Energy in Joules):
> ---------------------------------------------------
> 0.322866 2.619137 2.942003
>
>
> With this patchset (Energy in Joules):
> -----------------------------------------------
> 0.182721 2.443745 2.626466
>
>
> With WQ Unbound (Energy in Joules):
> -----------------------------------------------
> 0.2289042 2.2514632 2.4803674
So the scheduler does know what it's doing after all, which is a nice
news. Given the result, the best thing to do would be somehow marking
these workqueues as unbound for powersaving?
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists