[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5155ECBB.9000008@free-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 20:34:19 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
CC: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] video: ssd1307fb: Add support for SSD1306 OLED controller
Hi Jean Christophe,
Le 29/03/2013 19:38, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a écrit :
> On 17:44 Wed 06 Mar , Maxime Ripard wrote:
[snip]
>> static int ssd1307fb_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> struct fb_info *info;
>> - u32 vmem_size = SSD1307FB_WIDTH * SSD1307FB_HEIGHT / 8;
>> + struct device_node *node = client->dev.of_node;
>> + u32 vmem_size;
>> struct ssd1307fb_par *par;
>> u8 *vmem;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - if (!client->dev.of_node) {
>> + if (!node) {
> why this will be DT only?
>
> a platform or ARN that does not support DT can not use this driver
>
> this looks not right
Because the platform I was developing that for was DT-only, and I guess
if someone wants to use this driver on a non-DT platform, that
hypothetical someone can always send a patch to enable the "old-style"
probing in this driver.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists