[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51551E60.4070708@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:53:52 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Generic syscall ABI support
On 03/28/2013 09:41 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> You don't need a new glibc port, you need a new klibc or musl port.
>
> http://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2012/07/08/1
>
> Way less work than getting glibc working for your basic smoketest...
>
Good point. Average time to port klibc to a new architecture is about
four hours as long as the person porting knows the calling conventions
and assembly language involved.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists