[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130329072056.GA31269@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:20:56 +0100
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bowgotsai@...gle.com, "'Ryankao'" <ryankao@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: r8169 auto speed down issue
hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com> :
> Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@...zoreil.com]
> [...]
> > Your description suggests that testing against the link
> > partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for
^^^^^^^^^^ -> "and"
> > tp->link_ok could be good enough.
As a policy we may assume that capabilities of the link partner won't
change after a link loss event - and there is currently no way we can
change this policy - but it won't always work as expected (especially
if "expected == automagically").
[...]
> Furthermore, should it not speed down without linking, even though the cable
> would be plugged after suspending or shutdowning?
I don't get your point. Can you reformulate ?
--
Ueimor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists