linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] i2c: Ignore return value of i2c_del

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130330085539.442321fa@endymion.delvare>
Date:	Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:55:39 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] i2c: Ignore return value of i2c_del_adapter()

Hi Lars-Peter,

On Sat,  9 Mar 2013 19:16:46 +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> i2c_del_adapter() always returns 0.

I beg you pardon? i2c_del_adapter() starts with:

int i2c_del_adapter(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
{
	int res = 0;
	struct i2c_adapter *found;
	struct i2c_client *client, *next;

	/* First make sure that this adapter was ever added */
	mutex_lock(&core_lock);
	found = idr_find(&i2c_adapter_idr, adap->nr);
	mutex_unlock(&core_lock);
	if (found != adap) {
		pr_debug("i2c-core: attempting to delete unregistered "
			 "adapter [%s]\n", adap->name);
		return -EINVAL;
	}

	/* Tell drivers about this removal */
	mutex_lock(&core_lock);
	res = bus_for_each_drv(&i2c_bus_type, NULL, adap,
			       __process_removed_adapter);
	mutex_unlock(&core_lock);
	if (res)
		return res;
(...)

So, no, it doesn't "always return 0".

Thus nack from me.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/