[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130401122236.GD18636@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:22:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michel JAOUEN <michel.jaouen@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/33] regulator: ab8500-ext: Add support for AB9540
regulators
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 04:11:15PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> +static struct regulator_ops ab9540_ext_regulator_ops = {
> + .enable = ab8500_ext_regulator_enable,
> + .disable = ab8500_ext_regulator_disable,
> + .is_enabled = ab8500_ext_regulator_is_enabled,
> + .set_mode = ab8500_ext_regulator_set_mode,
> + .get_mode = ab8500_ext_regulator_get_mode,
> + .get_voltage = ab8500_ext_fixed_get_voltage,
> + .list_voltage = ab8500_ext_list_voltage,
> +};
> +
> + if (is_ab9540(ab8500) &&
> + ((info->desc.id == AB8500_EXT_SUPPLY1) ||
> + (info->desc.id == AB8500_EXT_SUPPLY2) ||
> + (info->desc.id == AB8500_EXT_SUPPLY3)))
> + info->desc.ops = &ab9540_ext_regulator_ops;
> +
This appears to be identical to the ab8500, why do we need a separate
set of ops?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists