[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130401162800.GB21522@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 17:28:00 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu, sqazi@...gle.com, yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: prevent bdev freeing while device in use
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:58:05AM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
> if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
> ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
> +
> + /* bdev lifecycle is defined by its bd_inode (see
> + * struct bdev_inode usage). In case of loop device we need to make
> + * sure that bdev deallocation will not happen between loop_set_fd()
> + * and loop_clr_fd() invocations. To do this we need to hold
> + * bdev inode here and put it later in loop_clr_fd().
> + */
> + ihold(bdev->bd_inode);
That's open-coded bdgrab()
> + if (bdev) {
> + BUG_ON(atomic_read(&bdev->bd_inode->i_count) < 2);
> + iput(bdev->bd_inode);
... and that - bdput() (I'd drop that BUG_ON())
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists