lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 13:09:09 -0700 From: Tim Hockin <thockin@...kin.org> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Aditya Kali <adityakali@...gle.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>, Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>, "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>, Max Kellermann <mk@...all.com>, Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] cgroups: Task counter subsystem v8 On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:43:03AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: >> A year later - what ever happened with this? I want it more than ever >> for Google's use. > > I think the conclusion was "use kmemcg instead". Pardon my ignorance, but... what? Use kernel memory limits as a proxy for process/thread counts? That sounds terrible - I hope I am misunderstanding? This task counter patch had several properties that mapped very well to what we want. Is it dead in the water? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists