[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXikU8-FkYYULHx50qP_ME2bRSzCC=8ZH8iDyUr2ug66g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:10:44 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: use Crash kernel for Crash kernel low
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 1:47 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 12:26 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
>> crashkernel=<size>,<option>,<option>.. and crashkernel=800M,high sound
>> good to me.
>>
>> So atleast for 3.9 kernel, shall we hide new semantics behind
>> crashkernel=XM,high and by default crashkernel=XM tries to emulate
>> crashkernel=XM,low to retain backward compatibility?
>
> Yes, I suspect so.
current we have:
1. crashkernel=XM
2. crashkernel=XM crashkernel_low=YM
so you want to change to
1. crashkernel=XM,low or crashkernel=XM
2. crashkernel=XM,high
3. crashkernel=XM,high crashkernel=YM,low
looks like you change your mind, now you are agreeing on
some could low and some could be high.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists