[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5j+jpXrcLDyAV+p81pjapaQeKQTMz4+JXjKj03DV-yoC=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:53:09 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] seccomp: add generic code for jitted seccomp filters.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr> wrote:
> Architecture must select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER_JIT and implement
> seccomp_jit_compile() and seccomp_jit_free() if they intend to support
> jitted seccomp filters.
>
> struct seccomp_filter has been moved to <linux/seccomp.h> to make its
> content available to the jit compilation code.
>
> In a way similar to the net BPF, the jit compilation code is expected
> to updates struct seccomp_filter.bpf_func pointer to the generated
> code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
I'd love to see this for x86 too. I suspect it'd be a small change
after this series lands.
Thanks,
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists