[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130401051042.GC12015@lge.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 14:10:42 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] sched: factor out code to should_we_balance()
Hello, Peter.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-28 at 16:58 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > There is not enough reason to place this checking at
> > update_sg_lb_stats(),
> > except saving one iteration for sched_group_cpus. But with this
> > change,
> > we can save two memset cost and can expect better compiler
> > optimization,
> > so clean-up may be more beneficial to us.
>
> It would be good if you'd described what you actually did, there's a
> lot of code movement and now I have to figure out wth you did and why.
Okay. I will do that when respin.
Thanks.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists